Obama’s Afghan Plan: About 40K More Troops
CBS Exclusive: Sources Say Force Will Grow to 100,000 – Nearly Filling Gen. McChrystal’s Request; Long-Term Stay Planned
(CBS) Tonight, after months of conferences with top advisors, President Obama has settled on a new strategy for Afghanistan. CBS News correspondent David Martin reports that the president will send a lot more troops and plans to keep a large force there, long term.
The president still has more meetings scheduled on Afghanistan, but informed sources tell CBS News he intends to give Gen. Stanley McChrystal most, if not all, the additional troops he is asking for.
McChrystal wanted 40,000 and the president has tentatively decided to send four combat brigades plus thousands more support troops. A senior officer says “that’s close to what [McChrystal] asked for.” All the president’s military advisers have recommended sending more troops.
But they also have warned that troops alone will not win the war unless Afghan President Hamid Karzai cleans up his government.
“He’s got to take concrete steps to eliminate corruption,” Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said last week. “That means you have to rid yourself of those who are corrupt. You have to actually arrest and prosecute them.”
The first combat troops would not arrive until early next year and it would be the end of 2010 before they were all there. That makes this Afghanistan surge very different from the Iraq surge, in which 30,000 troops descended on Baghdad and the surrounding area in just five months.
Fred Kagan of the American Enterprise Institute says a slow motion surge will produce slow motion results.
“If they’re going to be sort of trickled in very slowly over the course of a year than it’s unlikely to have a very decisive impact in the course of 2010,” he said.
The buildup would be expected to last about four years, until McChrystal completes his plan for doubling the size of the Afghan army and police force.
With 68,000 Americans already there, the Afghan surge would mean there would be 100,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan by the end of the president’s first term.
The president is not expected to announce his decision until after he returns from China the week before Thanksgiving.
CBS News | David Martin | Mon, Nov 9, 2009
Last 5 posts in Afghanistan
- Pentagon eyes contractor ties to hunt for militants - March 16th, 2010
- Afghan government claims coalition troops killed 12 civilians - March 14th, 2010
- CIA drone attacks produce America's own unlawful combatants - March 13th, 2010
- Suspected suicides increased in February - March 11th, 2010
- House defeats Kucinich resolution to withdraw from Afghanistan - March 10th, 2010
Last 5 posts in Obama Administration
- Why Did Kucinich Cave In To Obama? - March 19th, 2010
- US-Israeli relations hit new low over settlement plan - March 11th, 2010
- Romney: Obama’s words support 9/11 truthers abroad - March 8th, 2010
- Obama’s ‘Chicago mafia’ blamed for paralysis at the top - February 21st, 2010
- Hillary Clinton: 'Iran is moving towards a military dictatorship' - February 16th, 2010
Last 5 posts in War of Terror
- Blair's fight to keep his oil cash secret: Former PM's deals are revealed as his earnings since 2007 reach £20million - March 19th, 2010
- US drone strike kills 10 militants in Pakistan - March 16th, 2010
- Pentagon eyes contractor ties to hunt for militants - March 16th, 2010
- Afghan government claims coalition troops killed 12 civilians - March 14th, 2010
- U.S. commander might need troops beyond August - March 13th, 2010
