Posts Tagged ‘Capital Markets’
Macro Overview

The US dollar is consolidating the gains seen at the end of last week.  The greenback briefly pushed through the JPY102 level in Tokyo, but this was not sustained.  Meanwhile, the global equities are mostly lower, though the Nikkei tacked on another 1.2% to reach a new 5.5 year high. (Read more…)

Softer Chinese data may have weighed on emerging market stocks, which for the lower for the third consecutive session. In Europe, most bourses were lower the Dow Jones Stoxx 600 off about 0.4% near midday in London, led by a 1.3% decline in financial.  A lower close today would break a four -day advance that had carried the index to new five year highs last week.

Global bonds are mixed.  Japanese government bonds extended last week’s drop.  The benchmark 10-year yield rose almost 6 bp and now near 75 bp, the yield is near a 3-month high.  Spanish bond yields are extending last week’s increase, while Italy’s 10-year bond yield is up 5 bp, though little changed after the government’s auction that raised 8 bln euros with 3, 5, and 13 year tranches.  Core bonds are firmer, with yields 2-4 bp lower.

There are four developments at the end of last week are shaping the investment climate.

First, there was a sharp sell-off in US Treasuries and Japanese government bonds, albeit for different reasons.  The US sell-off seems to be driven by renewed ideas that the Fed could taper of purchases earlier and by the move further out on the risk frontier, illustrated by the decline in the yield of an industry benchmark for junk bonds below 5% for the first time.   

Some in the financial press give more emphasis to Philadelphia Fed President Plosser’s comments that he favors reducing QE as early as next month than we would.  Plosser is neither a voting member of the FOMC nor representative of a majority of Fed officials. 

However, we did read with interest a speech that Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke delivered before the weekend.  Amid concern that QE is producing bubbles in other parts of the capital markets, Bernanke explained that the  Federal Reserve was watching “particularly closely” investors “reaching for yield”.   He seemed sensitive to Minksy’s insight that the relative stability of (ie, low volatility?) may encourage investors to take greater risks than the macro-economic conditions warrant.  At this juncture, this seemed meant to reassure the market that the Fed is sensitive to the risks implicit in QE and not a signal of a near-term shift in policy. 

The sharp dramatic decline JGBs appears to be a function of officials still wrestling with the implementation of its aggressive JGB purchase project and the kind of disruption it is causing.  All else being equal, a sharp decline in the yen would tend to lift bond yields.  In addition, competitive investments, like the equities, may also be drawing investors out of the fixed income. 

Second, after first approaching it a month ago, the dollar finally broke through the JPY100 level.  The move continues to appear largely driven by hedge funds and other speculators, though Ministry of Finance data did show Japanese investors bought about $5 bln in foreign bonds in a two-week period ending in early May.  After breaking of key chart point the yen’s decline accelerated and G7 meeting said nothing that poses an obstacle to additional losses.

The next key chart points are in the JPY104-JPY105 area.   We suspect that by the end of the summer, perhaps after Abe would have secured a 2/3 majority in the upper house elections, the G7 may grow less accepting of additional yen weakness, especially if structural reforms are unconvincing.   

Third, the US dollar staged a broader rally against the major and emerging market currencies.   The Federal Reserve calculation of the dollar’s value on a trade-weight weighted basis are only updated at month end, and of course, the Dollar Index is not reflective of US trade patterns, with two of the US main partners, Mexico and China not represented at all.

The Bank of England offers a real effective trade-weighted measure in real time.  It finished last week at its highest level since July 2010.  In the QE-era, more questions have been raised about the use of paper money to measure other paper money, but surely the 20% drop in gold prices from the peak in Q4 12, is not suggestive of a weak US dollar either. 

Fourth, the extension of the Fed’s QE program to $85 bln a month was announced in December and has been digested by market participants.  Investors continue to grapple with the implications of Japan’s aggressive QE (~$75 bln a month).  As Japanese investors have purchased foreign bonds in two of the past three week, foreign investors, who had bought around $64 bln of Japanese equities this year have taken some profits in two of the past three weeks. 

Over the past week or so, Australia cut rates and has made it clear that it has not exhausted it scope for additional rate cuts.  In Asia, both India and South Korea lowered official rates.  In Europe, Poland cut rates at the end of last week and the ECB, which cut rates earlier this month, is also holding out the possibility of addition conventional (refi rate cut) and unconventional (e.g., measures to boost the ABS market and some talk of directly buying distressed bank bonds, for which we are highly skeptical). 

Turning to this week’s data stream, the US is likely report the second consecutive decline in retail sales today, with the headline dragged down by a decline in gasoline prices and auto sales.  The measure used for GDP calculations, which excludes these two components and building materials may eke out a small gain.  The decline in factory employment and, more importantly, the reduction in the work week, points to a decline in manufacturing when the industrial production is reported at mid-week.

Both PPI and CPI will be reported this week.  So-called pipeline inflation remains mild and CPI is likely to post its second consecutive monthly decline, which is something not seen in five years.  Lastly, the both the Empire State and Philly Fed surveys will be released and they offer among the first readings of the US economy in May and both are expected to stabilize after the recent declines.

The data highlight from the euro area and Japan will be Q1 GDP estimates near midweek.  The Japanese economy is expected to have been the strongest in the G7 in Q1 with a 0.7% quarterly expansion.  After contracting by 0.6% in Q4 12, is expected to have contracted by a 0.1% in Q1 13, helped by a rebound in the Germany economy.    In contrast, in the core, the French and Dutch economies are believed to have contracted in Q1.  

The UK releases its April jobs report on Wednesday, but the BOE’s quarterly inflation report the same day may garner more interest.  In addition to an update on how the BOE sees the trajectory of prices before Carney takes the reins in July, the market is also keen on the official assessment of the Funding-for-Lending Scheme which does not appear to be bolstering lending to small and medium sized businesses very much, though encouraged to by the government’s Help to Buy Scheme,  mortgage lending may be supported.

    



 
Argentina’s Modest Proposal: Buy Bonds Or Go To Jail

While Argentina’s recent extraordinary attempts at central planning have been widely documented, ranging from freezing supermarket prices in a (failed) attempt to control inflation, to banning advertising in a (failed) attempt to weaken the private media, so far nothing has worked at stabilizing the economy and preventing the collapse in the domestic currency (if leading to such humorous viral videos as #mequieroir). Ironically, this is both good and bad news. It is good news because as we showed two days ago, even the ludicrous speed rise in the Nikkei has been a snail’s pace compared to that other unknown “Nation 1.” We can now reveal that while Japan is Nation 2, Nation 1 is that inflationary basket case Argentina, and specifically its Merval stock index.

(Read more…)

Of course, the surge in the stock index is nothing more than a reflection of the ongoing collapse in the economy, which in turn is reflected not by the official, government controlled exchange of the ARS (just try buying dollars at the official rate) which closed the week at a rate of 5.24 to the dollar, then certainly the black market one, showing just how weak the currency is for those who actually want to buy dollars in Argentina, which just hit a record high of over 10. In fact, as the chart below shows, when one factors in the 80% collapse in the real, unofficial exchange rate over the same time period, the stock index has barely kept up.

Furthermore, it is merely a time before the runaway inflation pushes corporate input costs so high, that not even the rise in the stock market can preserve wealth.

Still think soaring stock prices in the New Normal are an indication of anything but a collapse in the economy manifested by either current, or discounted, plunges in the purchasing power of a sovereign’s currency?

And just to make sure there is no confusion, the full context here is that while the rest of the G-0 world at least has each other’s central banks to fund mutual debt purchases, Argentina has been locked out from the global community for a variety of reasons. And yet, like any other Keynesian follower, the nation is desperate to borrow from the future in order to grow government now. However, without access to capital markets how will the country with the imploding currency do this?

Simple. 

Argentina’s president Kirchner, a keen observer of recent events in Cyprus, has figured out a way to kill two birds with one stone, namely attempt to put an end to tax evasion, and fund the capex of the recently nationalized state oil company YPF (now that its former owner, Spainish Repsol, is less than keen to keep investing in its former Argentine subsidiary). To do that she will present the local tax-evading population (pretty much anyone with any disposable income and savings) with a simple choice: buy a 4% bond to fund YPF “growth” or go to prison.

From Bloomberg:

President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner wants tax evaders hiding about $160 billion in dollars to help finance Argentina’s oil-producing ambitions. Her offer: Buy a 4 percent bond or face the prospect of jail time.

The tax authority announced the plan May 7, highlighting its information-sharing agreements with 40 nations and warning Argentines who don’t use the three-month amnesty window that they risk fines or arrest. Evaders have two options for their cash and the only one paying interest will be a dollar bond due in 2016 to finance YPF SA (YPF), the state oil company. The 4 percent rate is a third the average 13.85 yield on Argentine debt and less than the 4.6 percent in emerging markets.

Speaking of YPF’s growth, we made it very clear a year ago when we reported on the latest “banana republic” nationalization of formerly efficient and private assets, that it was only a matter of time before an overarching government’s epic misallocation of resources, leads to epic inefficiencies, and a liquidity scramble. It is not rocket science: only hardcore socialists can harbor any hope that a government is efficient at allocating capital, especially when one nets out the 50% or so in corruption “externalities” that are incurred along the way, be it in Argentina or the US. Once again we were right:

A year after seizing YPF, Fernandez is funneling more money into the nation’s energy industry as the government struggles to boost production from the world’s third-biggest shale oil reserves. With Argentina already committed to pumping $2 billion of central bank reserves into a fund for energy investments and the highest borrowing costs in emerging markets keeping it from issuing debt abroad, the government is eyeing the billions of undeclared dollars that Argentines hold to help shore up reserves that have dwindled to a six-year low.

 

“The authorities need to take steps to open up external resources in the energy sector and to finance the Treasury and local governments,” said Sebastian Vargas, a New York-based analyst at Barclays Plc. “The amnesty is not negative for markets but it’s disappointing because they do little to solve balance-of-payment difficulties.”

There are some cynics who will say what Argentina is doing on a semi-voluntary basis is what that other bastion of wealth expropriation, the European Union, did to Cypriot savers. They will be right of course, if only for the simple reason that Argentina does not know precisely where all the “illegal” tax-evading, offshore (and onshore) capital is held.

Argentines have at least $160 billion of undeclared funds, equal to about 36 percent of the nation’s gross domestic product, and $40 billion are hidden inside the country, Vice Economy Minister Axel Kicillof said at the May 7 press conference where he and other senior officials presented the amnesty.

 

Many Argentines hide assets to avoid a 35 percent income tax and a levy of as much as 1.25 percent on their personal wealth. Undeclared assets are also beyond the reach of the government, which in 1989 seized bank certificates of deposit in exchange for bonds and in 2002 converted dollar deposits into pesos.

In other words, unlike in Europe, where Russia’s ‘tax-efficient’ billionaires had a bright shining red light blinking over Cyprus saying “we are here” (a light that is now blinking over Luxembourg, Lichtenstein and of course, Switzerland, not to mention other global offshore tax havens), in Argentina the government first has to find the money. Which is why its initial recourse is the conventional one: simple threats.

Those joining the plan would be immune from prosecution and won’t be forced to pay past-due taxes, said Ricardo Echegaray, head of the tax agency. The search for evaders, which includes cross-checking information on income and personal wealth reports with purchases of real estate and cars, foreign travel and credit card purchases, will continue, Echegaray said.

 

“You better bring your dollars back because we will find you,” Echegaray said at the May 7 press conference. Last year, tax collection in South America’s second-largest economy rose to 37 percent of gross domestic product from 16.5 percent in 2002, according to Economy Ministry data.

 

Former Vice Economy Minister Roberto Feletti, who is now a congressman for Fernandez’s Victory Front alliance, said the government expects to attract at least $5 billion under the program.

Good luck with that – the only thing Argentina will succeed is in forcing tax evaders to hide their money even deeper into the global shadow economy.

The amnesty program will probably fail because its benefits don’t outweigh investors’ mistrust of the government’s ability to rein in inflation, cut spending, attract foreign investment and restore confidence in the currency, according to Moody’s Analytics Inc.

 

“The problem the government faces is lack of credibility and lack of confidence,” Juan Pablo Fuentes, an economist at Moody’s, said in a telephone interview from West Chester, Pennsylvania. “That money is potentially there, it could come back eventually, but there needs to be a lot of changes. These bonds are not going to have any real impact.”

And in the meantime YPF, which can’t afford to wait on capital infusion, will have less and less cash with which to operate and grow, until finally it is mothballed, dimming the one bright light in Argentina’s economy, and leading to an even faster economic contraction, even more rapid devaluation of the Peso, if only in the black market of course, and an ever faster surge in inflation.

But at least the stock market will be off the charts: sounds like a fair exchange for yet another economy sent to an early grave by central planners.

    



 
Bernanke Takes a “Leak”

 

How about Bernanke's communication policy? The most important development for monetary policy in the last four years comes from a planted story in the Wall Street Journal on a Friday night. While I'm not surprised, I'm still disgusted. Press leaks to favorite journalists are no way to run this show. (Read more…)

 

wsj5.10

 

The WSJ/Hilsenrath article confirms that the Fed is in the process of changing course on it's QE policy. America has reached "Peak QE", from now on it will be downhill for this policy. May will probably be the last month where $85B of securities are sucked out of the market.

The Fed's new plan is to taper off QE over the balance of the year. Unlike the endings of QE1 & 2 the sunset for QE3 will be a bit of a surprise for markets. The stated intention (according to Hilsenrath) is to change the amounts of POMO purchases on a month to month basis. Reading through the lines, I get the impression that Bernanke is going to lower the QE buys one month, but should the markets react negatively, he would increase the purchases the following month in an effort to "rebuild confidence".

I don't see this new policy working at all. It's the predictability of POMO that gives QE it's market clout. When the predictability is replaced with uncertainty, the markets will not like it. What I find particularly galling is that the Fed believes that it can micro manage US (and global) capital markets. The Fed thinks it can reduce QE one month, but if markets swoon as a result it will just turn around and ratchet up the buying the following month. By doing so, the Fed can manage the markets. I say, "Not a chance".

 

The market's reaction to the Fed's change in policy will be interesting to observe. I expect that there will be some weakness in equities next week. There should be some back-up in rates across the curve, and I think the dollar will move higher (especially the Yen). But I don't see a blowup in the markets. The "Bernanke Put" is still alive for the time being.

The timing of the change in policy is interesting. Bernanke is no dope, he knows what the bond market is facing over the next five months, he knows that the bond calendar is very favorable for a wind-down of QE.

In two weeks the debt limit will be reached. After that date there will be a big reduction of new Treasury debt issued. Under normal conditions, the Treasury would have about $200b of wiggle room on the debt limit before there is a crisis. But in the summer and fall of 2013 the Treasury will reap an additional $60b of revenue from (incredibly) Fannie and Freddie. Based on this, I think the debt limit will not be a problem until sometime in October. So the reality is that over the next six months or so, there will be a shortage of new issue Treasury paper. This fact gives Bernanke the opportunity to reduce QE without a a big sell off in the bond market.

Then there is ZIRP. This policy will continue for a long time yet. The fact that the near-end is pegged at zero means that the long-end can't get out of control. And finally, there is the inflation outlook – this looks to be tame for the next few months.

The ten-year may back-up to above 2% (currently 1.90%), but I don't see 2.5% coming at at anytime in the immediate future. Towards the end of the year, when the debt limit is increased (it will be) there will be a flood of new issue paper and QE will be a non factor. That's when the bond guys will be looking at supply and demand, and running for cover.

 

There is one element of this that gets a chuckle from me. Last week, two hedge fund guys, Stan Druckenmiller and Paul Singer made comments about the risks of QE and the distortions the policy creates. Paul Krugman jumped all over the hedge fund types who appose more QE in a series of blog posts. (Link and Link)

PK did his best to discredit Druckenmiller and Singer. PK said that those who appose Bernanke are just a bunch of stinkers who are short bonds and want to make money. PK's rant is pretty amusing, he even takes a shot at gold investors. The final line of one of the posts was interesting. PK was attempting to highlight the "greed factor" that he thought was the real reason behind money managers opposition to continuing QE. In his usual snarky way, PK attempted to convince his readers that Bernanke Bashers had to have evil intent, that or they were gay, or suffered child abuse. I thought this line was obnoxious:

 

So anyway, the phenomenon of Bernanke rage is interesting. It probably has something to do with sexual orientation or childhood trauma, right?

 

My message to Krugman:

The WSJ article today was planted by Bernanke, and approved by Yellen. Clearly, these two also see that QE is a policy that has high risk and marginal returns. The article confirms what Druckenmiller and Singer were saying. They were right – you were wrong. Do you have the integrity to admit that? Or are you going to suggest that Bernanke also has sexual orientation issues, or suffers from childhood abuse? If an elected official had used these words (even as a nasty joke) they would be called on the carpet. The words "Shit Heel" come to mind.

 

Smear