Posts Tagged ‘New Zealand’
Why Japan Is Bad For The World

Japan continues to be the world’s biggest financial story. The consensus seems to be that the country’s extraordinary economic measures are good for both itself and the world. I’ve detailed previously how Japan’s efforts are likely to have terrible domestic economic consequences, whether they succeed or not. Today, I’m going to explore the latter idea: that Yen depreciation will benefit other countries as they’ll depreciate their own currencies, which will make their economies more competitive too. This idea, put forward by some serious financial commentators, is laughable as it ignores both history and any sense of simple logic. (Read more…) The implications are worth exploring though as competitive currency devaluations have already begun and are likely accelerate from here.

Better figures, but…

First, let’s provide some context by looking at recent events in Japan. Over the past week, Japan released GDP figures for the first quarter of 2013 which showed growth of 0.9% from the previous quarter, versus expectations of a 0.7% rise. Annualised, GDP grew 3.5%, the fastest in a year, and topped a 1% rise in the fourth quarter of last year.

Ironically, Japan 3.5% annualised growth in the first quarter crushed most other developed countries, including the U.S., where there’s supposed to be meaningful recovery going on (it recorded 2.5% growth).

Looking under the hood at Japan’s figure though, the result wasn’t that impressive. That’s because the GDP figure is a real figure, rather than a nominal one. Adjusted for a larger than expected GDP deflator (a measure of domestic prices) of -1.2%, nominal GDP grew 0.4% from the previous quarter, less than analyst expectations of 0.5%.

On the positive side though, private consumption and exports did trend up. Consumption rose 0.9%, as expected, and was up for a second consecutive quarter. This suggests that consumers may be buying into Abenomics (the nickname for the Japanese Prime Minister’s new policies) and willing to spend more. Exports also contributed 0.4% to GDP as they benefited from a 30% decline in the Yen since November last year.

Separate figures gave contradictory signals as to whether Japanese businesses are buying into Abenomics. Machinery orders in March increased 14% from the prior month, or 2.5% from the previous year. This beat expectations for growth of 3.5% and -4.9% respectively. The machinery orders figures ran counter to earlier numbers which showed capital spending for the first quarter declined 0.7%.

All in all, the economic data show mild improvement. Whether there’s a sustained future bounce is the big question. There are two things that will indicate whether Japan’s policies are starting to have a real impact: rising inflation and wages. Both haven’t happened yet and the latter especially is critical to policy success.

Bond yields spike 

The other interesting action of the past week has been in Japan’s bond markets. Japanese government bonds (JGBs) have had a spectacular sell-off over the past week. Yields on 10-year JGBs rose by half of its value at one stage. This was despite buying from the Bank of Japan (BoJ) of government bonds ranging from 1 to 10 years to the tune of 1.2 trillion yen (US$12 billion).

japan-government-bond-yield

The economic bulls argue that rising bond yields mean the economy is starting to normalise and that the Bank of Japan (BoJ) is succeeding in its aim to spur inflation (which will drive yields higher).

The bears suggest that increasing yields are a terrible sign as they mean liquidity in bonds is drying up as the market becomes increasingly controlled by a single buyer, the BoJ.

Either way, the BoJ is now buying 70% of new government debt issuance and that is likely to increase going forward. The government can’t allow bond yields to rise as this will mean interest on government debt rises too. Japan is in an unenviable position on this front as interest on government debt already consumes more than 25% of government revenue. A further sharp rise in bond yields will be a disaster.

While it’s clear that the BoJ can partially control the bond and equity markets (it’s buying stocks too), it has less direct control over the currency market. The yen has had an extraordinary tumble since the new government came to office in December. With more money printing to come, the yen is almost certainly heading much lower though. That’s despite being clearly oversold in the very short-term.

Yen decline is good for Europe?

A conscious decision to devalue the yen may or may not work in Japan (I’ve argued the latter for some time). But a related question is whether that decision is good for countries outside Japan.

I have addressed this question briefly before. But I thought it was worth going into some more detail given the issue has garnered more debate over the past month.

In particular, there’s been an argument gaining traction in serious economic circles that the yen’s decline will be good for other countries as it will force them to print money in order to lower their own currencies and remain economically competitive. This is particularly the case for European exporters, such as Germany, which are being hurt by the rising competitiveness of Japanese exporters due to the lower yen.

U.S. economics professor, Tim Duy, makes the case:

“… this [yen depreciation] is exactly what the global economy needs right now. If Germany and by extension Europe experiences weaker growth, European policymakers will need to respond. And they are not likely to respond by buying Yen to hold its value up. They are likely to respond by stimulating their domestic economy directly via easier monetary policy and, hopefully, easier fiscal policy.

In other words, successful domestically-orientated policy in Japan will have second-round effects that will induce further policy easing [in] Europe. And a good kick in the pants in Europe is exactly what we need right now. Rather than thinking about Japan’s policy as triggering “competitive devaluations”, think of it as triggering “coordinating global easing.”

And an assistant U.S economics professor, David Beckworth, similarly argues:

“The ECB [European Central Bank] may ease to keep the Euro from getting too expensive and in the process shore up European domestic demand. How ironic it would be if Abenomics were to accomplish in the Eurozone that intense human suffering could not: moving the ECB to forcefully act.”

I cannot think of a more preposterous and dangerous idea than that being put forward by these seemingly eminent individuals. Let’s put aside the idea that countries are made stronger by weakening their currencies, which history has refuted time and time again.

No, let’s focus instead on drawing out their argument to its logical conclusion. If Europe abandons austerity (which it has never really pursued) and prints money to significantly weaken its currency, this would start to equalise the competitiveness of the likes of German exporters against Japanese exporters.

In other words, Japan’s exporters are gaining global share at the moment vis-à-vis the Europeans due to its lower currency. These gains would reverse if Europe depreciates its own currency.

Naturally, the Japanese wouldn’t be happy with this at all. They would print more money to accelerate the depreciation of the yen. The Europeans would again retaliate upon losing export share. And so it would go on. Overall, any gains through currency devaluation would be short-lived.

But that’s not the end of it. If you assume that other countries follow Europe in devaluing their own currencies, then the whole world would be after lower currencies. This would be of little benefit to Japan. Put simply, Japan’s policies depend on other countries not following their lead.

It’s not hard to see a currency fight turning more nasty. If Japan can’t gain an advantage from deliberate yen depreciation, it’s likely to try other means. Those other means include increased tariffs and/or trade sanctions. Once this happens, global trade would be hit and everyone would lose.

The above discussion has left aside the real reason for Japan’s currency deprecation: to import inflation. A declining yen makes imports more expensive, thereby potentially inducing higher inflation. That’s what Japan is targeting. I’ll leave this issue for another day though.

When does retaliation begin in earnest?

This brings us to the issue of when the rest of the world will begin to react to Japan’s policies in earnest. Of course, some countries have already reacted. Recently, South Korea and Australia surprised with interest rate cuts. Switzerland and New Zealand have moved directly to cap their currencies. And Thailand and the Philippines are looking to move soon. It’s clear that Japan’s weak yen policies are already having a large impact on other countries.

Other major exporting countries such as Germany and China are clearly worried. Both have expressed concerns about Japan’s policies as their own respective currencies have strengthened considerably, particularly in yen terms.

If you’re like me and expect the yen to continue to decline over the next 12 months, it won’t be long before so-called currency wars start to intensify. And unlike the economic ideologues who think that everyone will win when this happens, I think the reality is likely to prove very different.

This post was originally published at Asia Confidential: http://asiaconf.com/2013/05/17/why-japan-is-bad-for-the-world/

    



 
Uncle Buck Upstages Bernanke

Some recent volatility in currency markets began with the Reserve Bank of New Zealand intervening to stem the rise of the Kiwi. At the same time, the Reserve Bank of Australia cut its overnight lending rate. Both actions caused sharp declines in their currencies. (Read more…) These currencies had been a particular favorite of Japanese investors (aka, Mrs. Watanabe) seeking more yield than what’s available in Japan.

All this roiled currency markets Friday in Asia as the yen plummeted further crossing the psychological level of 100 vs the dollar. Bucky rallied against most other currencies feeding on itself Friday in the U.S. This then slammed gold, other commodities and in turn hurt commodity dependent emerging markets. Equity markets in Japan rallied mightily as the yen/dollar cross collapsed. Also JGBs (Japanese 10 year bond prices fell by the limit.) A natural economic competitor to Japan, South Korea, saw its equity market slide as its currency (won) declined to match the yen’s fall. (South Korea still remains a major weighting in the MSCI Emerging Market Index which saw the index slide over 1%) Like falling dominoes, Brazil’s real currency also fell on inflation fears. And so it went.    

As Greenlight Capital’s David Einhorn observed in his client letter: “…unconventional monetary policies is now a global phenomena. Other central bankers notice and, acting in the philosophy of ‘Anything you can do, I can do better,’ take turns in one-upmanship. This serially correlated behavior smacks of a bubble mentality. But investors are currently complacent about the unintended consequences of central bank money printing, and like most investment cycles and fads, this will persist until it doesn’t.”  

This chaotic market behavior will no doubt be addressed at this weekend’s G-7 meeting in London. Other than calming rhetoric, there is little else they may do since currency wars and QE game is now a “global phenomena”.

The Bernanke Chicago speech became little more than a side show Friday. He did say the Fed was keeping a watchful eye on yield risk-taking given ZIRP. He’s a little late to that observation methinks.

Bond Daddy Bill Gross (PIMCO) tweeted the long bond bull market is over. The statement is honest yet odd since he owns more bonds anyone.

U.S. stock markets didn’t fluctuate too much Friday but beneath the surface conditions appeared more tenuous. Thursday we noted how recent ultra-light trading combined with active algo/HFT trading made the market vulnerable to rumors. Current algos are programmed to pick-up any hints of trouble and run with it before the next guy. That makes markets more accident prone.

Tech (QQQ), homebuilders (ITB), consumer discretionary (XLY) and biotech (IBB) led markets higher. Losers included gold miners (GDX), energy (XLE) and bonds (TLT). The dollar (UUP) rallied sharply while gold (GLD) was the big loser. Commodities (DBC) fell sharply along with energy (USO).

For us carbon-based but systematic investors it’s a battle of trend-following duty vs emotions when dealing with current markets. The higher we go the more systems are challenged to stay with the trend. Taking some profits and raising stops is all one can do.

Volume remains ultra-light despite all the market-moving action from overseas and currency chaos. Breadth per the WSJ was positive.

You can follow our pithy comments on twitter and become a fan of ETF Digest on facebook.

You can follow our pithy comments on twitter and become a fan of ETF Digest on facebook. 

SPY 5 MINUTE

SPY 5 MINUTE

.SPX WEEKLY

.SPX WEEKLY

INDU WEEKLY

INDU WEEKLY

RUT WEEKLY

RUT WEEKLY

QQQ WEEKLY

QQQ WEEKLY

IGV WEEKLY

IGV WEEKLY

FDN WEEKLY

FDN WEEKLY

SOXX WEEKLY

SOXX WEEKLY

XLF WEEKLY

XLF WEEKLY

XLI WEEKLY

XLI WEEKLY

XLY WEEKLY

XLY WEEKLY

XLP WEEKLY

XLP WEEKLY

ITB WEEKLY

ITB WEEKLY

IYR WEEKLY

IYR WEEKLY

YMLP WEEKLY

YMLP WEEKLY

AMLP WEEKLY

AMLP WEEKLY

IEF WEEKLY

IEF WEEKLY

UUP WEEKLY

UUP WEEKLY

FXE WEEKLY

FXE WEEKLY

FXY WEEKLY

FXY WEEKLY

FXA WEEKLY

FXA WEEKLY

GLD WEEKLY

GLD WEEKLY

SLV WEEKLY

SLV WEEKLY

GDX WEEKLY

GDX WEEKLY

JJC WEEKLY

JJC WEEKLY

XME WEEKLY

XME WEEKLY

USO WEEKLY

USO WEEKLY

XLE WEEKLY

XLE WEEKLY

EFA WEEKLY

EFA WEEKLY

EEM WEEKLY

EEM WEEKLY

IEV WEEKLY

IEV WEEKLY

EWU WEEKLY

EWU WEEKLY

EWA WEEKLY

EWA WEEKLY

EWM WEEKLY

EWM WEEKLY

EWJ WEEKLY

EWJ WEEKLY

EWS WEEKLY

EWS WEEKLY

IDX WEEKLY

IDX WEEKLY

EWZ WEEKLY

EWZ WEEKLY

EPI WEEKLY

EPI WEEKLY

GXC WEEKLY

GXC WEEKLY

NYMO

NYMO

The NYMO is a market breadth indicator that is based on the difference between the number of advancing and declining issues on the NYSE. When readings are +60/-60 markets are extended short-term.

NYSI

NYSI

The McClellan Summation Index is a long-term version of the McClellan Oscillator. It is a market breadth indicator, and interpretation is similar to that of the McClellan Oscillator, except that it is more suited to major trends. I believe readings of +1000/-1000 reveal markets as much extended.

VIX

$VIX

The VIX is a widely used measure of market risk and is often referred to as the “investor fear gauge”. Our own interpretation is highlighted in the chart above. The VIX measures the level of put option activity over a 30-day period. Greater buying of put options (protection) causes the index to rise.


 

This was a light week for economic data but a heavy week for currency chaos. Bulls gutted it out to close the week with a lift. But we’ve seen other markets roiled particularly emerging markets, Australia and Asia in general.

Next week we’ll get more in the way of economic data (Retail Sales, Industrial Production, Housing data, Empire State Mfg, Philly Fed, Jobless Claims and Consumer Sentiment). Europe will also provide some GDP data. The tail end of earnings and more QE is on the way no doubt.

Markets are overbought from an intermediate term view but corrections have been difficult to come by with all this liquidity.

Let’s see what happens.

 

    



 
Previewing The Market’s “Taper” Tantrum

The reason for yesterday’s late day swoon was a humorous tweet, which subsequently became a full-blown serious rumor, that the WSJ’s Hilsenrath would leak the first hint that the Fed is contemplating preannouncing the “tapering” of its $85 billion in monthly purchases. Naturally, this did not happen as we explained. And yet, judging by the market’s response there is substantial concern that the Fed may do just that. To be sure, it is quite likely that in addition to just rumblings out of economists, which are always wrong and thus ignored, that one of the Fed’s unofficial channels may hint at some tightening in the monthly flow (if certainly not halt, and absolutely not unwind). Which makes sense: all previous instances of non-open ended QE took place for up to 6-9 months before the Fed briefly let (Read more…) the accelerator to see just how big the downward response is. The problem now, however, is that even the tiniest hint that the grossly overvalued “market”, which has risen only thanks to multiple expansion for the past year, would lead to a massive overshoot not only to whatever an ex-Fed “fair value” may be, but overshoot wildly as the liquidation programs kick in across a Wall Street that is more liquidity starved today than it has been in a decade.

This is precisely what Scotiabank’s Guy Haselmann thinks:

“Few care about “right-tail” events, but should investors decide to pare risk in reaction to a hint of ‘tapering’, the overshoot to the downside may surprise many. The combination of too many sellers, too few buyers, and dreadful (and declining) liquidity means a down-side overshoot is highly likely.”

We certainly agree.

it is precisely just this illiquidity driven “deflationary” overshoot to the downside in a world which suddenly finds itself without a safety net, that will be just the thing that drags the Fed right back in, and forces Bernanke or Yellen (or heaven forbid, Geithner), to double down on the monthly amount of flow, launching the latest and greatest dollar-crushing, inflation stimulating reliquification tsunami.

Because if we have learned anything, it is that the equity market can no longer function without the Fed’s “put” in place at every given moment.

From Scotiabank, on why a “tapering” may be imminent, if only for purely optical and “transitory” reasons:

The bullets below list reasons why the Fed would want to “leak” hints of a tapering now.

  • On Monday morning of this week, the RBNZ (New Zealand) and BoK (Korea) intervened in the currency market to try to dull the strength of their currencies. Soon afterward, Sweden and Chile announced they might have to intervene as well. Poland cuts rates to weaken the Zloty.
    • These actions and comments show that the external ramifications of QE will no longer be tolerated passively. These moves represent a tacit protest against QE. It could be argued that if QE policies do not subside soon, other governments are now willing to retaliate with counter-measures (currency wars, “a race to the bottom”, protectionism).
  • When FOMC members discuss the “costs” of their policies, they are partially referring to the potential for asset bubbles and distortions to price discovery. The Fed has had its foot on the accelerator so long that easing off should provide information from how markets react.
  • In the past 10 days, the yield on the Barclays High Yield Index has collapsed from 5.37% to 4.97%. A 4-handle on Junk bonds is truly remarkable. High Grade spreads have also been tightening materially.
  • Credit Default Swap (CDS) premiums have been declining rapidly and plummeted the past two weeks to all-time low levels. Certainly, marginal buyers have continued to be chased into the market from fears of missing the up-trade and promises of the Fed “put” protecting the downside, but the collapse in CDS premiums represent bear capitulation and the futile results of hedging risk.
  • Equities are higher by almost 15% YTD (46% on an annualized basis). The FOMC wants asset inflation (the Pigou Effect), but trading has become decidedly one way. The S&P 500 has rallied 13 out of the last 14 days. There was increasing talk of equities “melting up” and finally stated publicly by Stan Druckenmiller.
  • NYSE Margin Debt has matched the highest levels in history (July 2007).
  • Tobin’s Q ratio is the best predictor of market corrections (of 20%+). James Tobin won a noble prize for it. He hypothesized that the combined market value of all the companies on the stock market should be about equal to their replacement costs. The Q ratio is calculated as the market value of a company divided by the replacement value of the firm’s assets. The ratio is approaching levels similar to 1907, 1929, 1937, 1969, 2001/2, and 2008.
  • The Fed has been accused of ‘enabling’ fiscal stalemate. There is an article in the WSJ today about how improving Federal finances lessens the urgency for Republicans and Democrats to negotiate. Stable and rising asset market prices have the same effect. As negotiations begin, providing a warning shot that the Fed cannot do the heavy lifting forever, may be a wise move.
    • After all, the debt ceiling limit gets hit next week on May 18th, at which point the Treasury will have to invoke extraordinary measures to prevent default (something they can do until September).
  • Congressional and market criticism has been increasing.
  • The Treasury will probably be cutting issuance in Q3 due to an improving position. This effectively means if the Fed continues to buy at the current pace, it would be buying an even greater percentage of visible supply.
  • It is possible that Bernanke made a suggestion about ‘tapering’ in his Chicago speech today, when he used the words “reaching for yield”. The dollar and the bond market are just beginning to notice and react. The other markets will likely soon follow.

Fed tapering would catch the market off-sides. At some level, FOMC members must realize they have created a moral hazard dilemma and conditions of over-promising what they can deliver. Tapering would symbolically put a dent in market sentiment and the implicit ‘put’. The many investors that have been drifting into riskier assets in a scramble for yield would begin to prudently re-focus on the downside risks to these assets.

It is possible a steep decline in financial assets would ensue with the lowest part of the capital structure being hurt the most. The Fed has chased investors all in the same direction; into risk-seeking securities. Few care about “right-tail” events, but should investors decide to pare risk in reaction to a hint of ‘tapering’, the overshoot to the downside may surprise many. The combination of too many sellers, too few buyers, and dreadful (and declining) liquidity means a down-side overshoot is highly likely. It would provide the Fed with their answer as to whether they have been creating market bubbles.