Posts Tagged ‘Obama Administration’
The New New York Housing Bubble: Park Avenue “Maids Quarters” Studio For $3.9 Million

To those who have already submitted their applications to launder their cash buy an apartment or better yet, have already wired the money to purchase any of the still to be built residences at 432 Park, the 84-story giant that is set to become the tallest residential building in the Western hemisphere, congratulations.

Although that is technically inappropriate: for full effect we would have to say “congratulations” in the buyers’ native tongue, be it Russian, Mandarin, Spanish or Arabic, because it sure won’t be English in the ongoing scramble to park trillions in cash away from a global banking system now hell bent on confiscating it, especially away from Europe’s insolvent and massively levered banks as shown yesterday, and in the Cyprus template aftermath, the cleanest dirty shirt has once again emerged as midtown Manhattan real estate just (Read more…) we said would happen last September.

However, to call the emerging, full-blown panic scramble to park cash sight unseen, with zero regard for asking price “a bubble”, would a slap in the face of all calm, cool and collected bubbles everywhere. Because any time someone is willing to pay $95 million  for a non-duplex one-floor apartment, $44.8 million for a 4-bedroom apartment, $10 million for a two-bedroom, or a paltry $3.9 million for a maid’s quarters studio (no really), something far more profound is going on beneath the surface than a simple asset bubble.

The NYT explains:

Only 10 floors have been completed in what is intended to be the tallest residential building in the Western Hemisphere — a slender, 84-story tower on Park Avenue at 56th Street in Manhattan. But the top penthouse is already under contract for $95 million.

 

Other buyers have snapped up apartments on lower floors for prices that are almost as breathtaking. While their identities are not known, it is likely that many are the rootless superrich: Russian metals barons, Latin American tycoons, Arab sheiks and Asian billionaires.

 

Ultraluxury housing and construction is booming across Manhattan, which is now beginning to rival London in popularity with the world’s wealthy. The number of condominium buildings in the borough with apartments selling for more than $15 million has risen to 49, up from 33 in 2009, according to CityRealty.

In a sence, New York has joined the rest of the world’s “wealth parking” capitals, where the only two profitable construction projects are those targeting the uber-wealthy or the mega poor. Middle class: sorry, you are out of luck

There are only two markets, ultraluxury and subsidized housing,” said Rafael Viñoly, the architect who designed the tower on Park Avenue at 56th Street, which is called 432 Park.

 

The rush to build these towers underscores the gap between rich and poor in New York City, said James Parrott, chief economist for the Fiscal Policy Institute, a liberal research organization supported by unions. He said that median family income in the city had fallen 8 percent since 2008.

 

“Manhattan’s superluxury condo boom, along with rocketing foreclosures in Queens and record homelessness, present an unobstructed view of accelerating polarization in this recovery,” Mr. Parrott said

Recovery? Tell that to those countless middle-class New Yorkers (whose annual income as marginal as it may be in the City is what the rest of America can only dream of) for whom stagnant wages will mean an ever greater portion of income has to go to paying rent with little left for boosting the velocity of money.

Of course, for those close to the banking system’s proximity to ZIRP, and the trillions in free reserve-based money (all of which is going into the stock market if not the economy) the current bubble is unlike anything seen before:

Izak Senbahar, the developer of 56 Leonard, a 60-story tower in TriBeCa where penthouses are going for more than $20 million, signed contracts with buyers for 70 percent of the 140 apartments in just 10 weeks.

 

“We were all surprised,” Mr. Senbahar said. “This was not what we expected. There’s a pent-up demand for condos with helicopter views.” A decade or two ago, luxury buildings were largely confined to Park and Fifth Avenues.

 

Today, they are rising all over Manhattan — from One57 and the Baccarat in Midtown Manhattan to 825 First Avenue on the East Side, 150 Charles Street in Greenwich Village and 30 Park Place downtown.

 

“It’s not that location is unimportant,” said Nancy Packes of Signature Marketing Services. “But it’s now all about bigness, lifestyle and views.”

But back to what is set to be the most recent residential crowning glory in the city: 432 Park.

In an interview, the developer of 432 Park, Harry B. Macklowe, said he and his partner, CIM Group, already had contracts for nearly $1 billion worth of apartments at the building. Total sales are expected to surpass $3 billion for a building that will cost about $1.25 billion to complete, he said.

 

The cheapest apartment in the building, a 351 square-foot studio, costs $1.59 million, according to the offering prospectus.

Of course, it is unclear what foreign money-laundering conglomerate baron would want to be seen in polite public having bought their in house butler a meager $1.6 million apartment. Luckily, there are maids’ quarters studios in the same building for nearly $4 million, which we expect there will be a biddin war for.

“This is the building of the 21st century, the way the Empire State Building was the building of the 20th century,” Mr. Macklowe said.The penthouse has six bedrooms, seven bathrooms and a library. A sculptured bathtub sits in front of a window, offering IMAX-like views of the city. A buyer can also pick up a $3.9 million studio for the housekeeper and a private wine cellar for $300,000.

Visually:

To summarize the conditions of modern-ray Rome, a world of unprecedented wealth for some, where real estate has become a simple proxy for parking capital (at least until such time the administration reminds all foreign buyers you don’t really own, you lease from the government, a government which may and will hike property taxes to any level it desires at a moment’s notice) most of it lying unused, yet where living conditions for “everyone else” are at Great Depression levels:

  • About half the buyers are foreigners, Mr. Macklowe said.
  • As with many of these buildings, only about a quarter of the units will be occupied at any one time.

Surely, high fives are due to all 1%’ers, even if, on the other end of the social spectrum, it means this:

New York’s Homelessness Worst Since The Great Depression

State and local governments nationwide have struggled to accommodate a homeless population that has changed in recent years – now including large numbers of families with young children. As the WSJ reports, more than 21,000 children – an unprecedented 1% of the city’s youth – slept each night in a city shelter in January, an increase of 22% in the past year; as homeless families now spend more than a year in a shelter, on average, for the first time since 1987. New York City has seen one of the steepest increases in homeless families in the past decade, advocates said, growing 73% since 2002, and “is facing a homeless crisis worse than any time since the Great Depression.”

Homeless advocates said the Obama administration has focused on more visible problems, such as those sleeping on the streets, taking resources away from families. The steep rise has reignited questions about whether New York’s economic turnaround of the past two decades has helped the city’s poorest residents as they note (despite today’s Dow record highs), “the economy is nowhere near where it was.”

The blame apparently lies at the cessation of ‘entitlements’ as the DHS adds, since the end – in Spring 2011 – of a state-funded program that subsidized rent for people leaving shelters; homeless families have gone up 35%; but they also added that the city was working to find employment for the homeless, “a long-term solution.” Boston and Washington DC are also seeing homeless numbers surge.

 

But why end on a depressing note.

Instead, take a look at what those living at the top of the building (at least on those rare occasions they come to visit their “assets”) and breathe the ultra clean air some 1271 feet above street level, will see as they do their best to avoid any interaction with a world mired ever deeper in a global recession… but only for others.

    



 
What Did Obama Know About The IRS (And When)?

Amid the sound and fury of yesterday’s IRS hearing were a few small tidbits which raise significant questions about who knew what and when within the Obama administration. While getting the answer (the real honest truth) is highly unlikely, as the Wall Street Journal notes, the IRS’s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 (when Republican lawmakers were complaining publicly about alleged IRS targeting of tea-party groups) he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president’s re-election campaign. The revelation nonetheless raised a fresh set of questions about who was aware of the problem within the Obama administration. However, the hearing left numerous other fundamental questions unanswered, including who ordered the targeting and (Read more…) it continued so long, pointing to a protracted investigation ahead as Rep. Paul Ryan exclaimed, “how can we not conclude that you misled this committee?As Doug Ross’ full timeline below suggests, this is fascism on the part of the IRS and White House…

 

Via Doug Ross of Director Blue blog,

Reading this timeline, I have come to three conclusions:

 

  1. Steve Miller lied to Congress
  2. Lois Lerner lied to Congress
  3. Barack Obama lied to the American people

This scandal has the fingerprints of Axelrod, Jarrett and/or the Chicago Machine all over it.

This is fascism on the part of the IRS and the White House. It is fascism, straight up.

Or, as I call the IRS: Organizing for Revenue.

 

Via The Wall Street Journal,

The Internal Revenue Service’s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups…

 

 

The revelation nonetheless raised a fresh set of questions about who was aware of the problem within the Obama administration.

 

 

the agency had taken “absolutely inappropriate” actions in targeting conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status for often heavy-handed scrutiny.

 

 

The hearing left numerous other fundamental questions unanswered, however, including who ordered the targeting and why it continued so long, pointing to a protracted investigation ahead. Mr. Miller conceded the agency likely disciplined the wrong employee in one effort to address the problem.

 

 

House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R., Mich.), “I think the most interesting revelation was the overall arrogance of the IRS and the lack of information from somebody who was in charge,”

 

 

White House officials say they learned about the targeting of conservative groups from the report, and not before. President Barack Obama on Thursday said, “I can assure you that I certainly did not know anything about the IG report before the IG report had been leaked through the press.”

 

 

At the hearing, lawmakers of both parties expressed anger that IRS officials didn’t reveal the problems to them in 2012.

 

 

then-commissioner Douglas Shulman about that in March 2012. He testified before the Ways and Means committee then that there was “absolutely no targeting,”

 

 

“Throughout this time, the IRS leadership has demonstrated a total disregard for the oversight role of the Congress and this committee,” said Rep. Sander Levin

 

 

How was that not misleading this committee?” said Rep. Paul Ryan (R., Wis.) to Mr. Miller. “How can we not conclude that you misled this committee?”

 

    



 
The Quiet Triumph Of Oil And Gas In Obama’s Policies

Wolf Richter   www.testosteronepit.com   www.amazon.com/author/wolfrichter

(Read more…)

It was announced Friday afternoon, when no one was supposed to pay attention: after years of controversy, heated rhetoric, intense lobbying, and stiff opposition from some unlikely bedfellows, with multinational industrial and chemical companies weighing down one side of the bed, and environmentalists tossing and turning on the other, the Obama Administration decided in favor of the US oil and gas industry. With geopolitical ramifications.

The Department of Energy “conditionally authorized” Freeport LNG Expansion LP and FLNG Liquefaction LCC (Freeport) to export domestically produced liquefied natural gas to countries with which the US does not have Free Trade Agreements (PDF, 132 pages). Already allowed are exports to the 20 countries with FTAs – most of them in the Americas, but also Australia, Korea, Singapore, Israel, Jordan, Bahrain, Oman, and Morocco. But exports to the remaining 180 or so countries have to jump through some hoops.

So Freeport’s LNG Terminal on Quintana Island, Texas, is now authorized to export 1.4 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) of LNG for 20 years to those non-FTA countries. Freeport joins Cheniere Energy Inc.’s Sabine Pass terminal in Cameron Parish, Louisiana, with an export capacity of 2.2 Bcf/d. Freeport’s and Cheniere’s combined capacity would amount to 5.2% of US production (estimated at 69.3 Bcf/d in 2013). Other companies are cooling their heels in line at the DOE, which would, as it said, “process the applications currently pending on a case-by-case basis.” At snail’s pace. The administrations sole concession to environmentalists.

“DOE has had the remaining applications on its desk for months and should ensure that these applications are approved without any further delay,” groused Erik Milito, of the American Petroleum Institute, a trade association representing over 500 oil and gas companies.

Hurdles remain. DOE approval is just another step. The plants will have to get a permit from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and must pass an environmental review, which could be a nail-biter. And none of the plants are up and running yet.

Then there is an unknown: how will world markets react to this additional supply that competes with at least 63 LNG export terminals currently planned or under construction worldwide? US production can rise to meet that new demand, as the gas glut in recent years has demonstrated in its bloody manner. But for production to rise significantly, the price – which is still below the cost of production for most “dry” gas wells – must rise as well.

Industrial and chemical companies that use natural gas for energy or as feedstock are deeply worried. Would they end up having to pay European prices? Or catastrophically, Japanese prices? The gas industry and its pundits have feverishly assured them that LNG exports would have “only minimal impacts” on gas prices in the US. Yet, the moment DOE announced its decision Friday afternoon, natural gas spiked about 3%, before retracing some of it.

The largest potential customers for LNG are Europe and Japan – staunch allies of the US. Europe is furiously trying to break the stranglehold that Russia’s Gazprom has on its gas supplies. Norway has morphed into a large producer, but it isn’t nearly enough. With prices two to three times higher than in the US, cheaper US gas hitting these markets would wreak havoc in Russia and its political clout in Europe. It would be a game changer in the EU economy, which is bogged down in high energy prices. And it would bring the European allies closer to the US.

But it might not happen, at least not initially: because there is Japan, the world’s largest most desperate importer of LNG since the shutdown of its 50 surviving nuclear reactors following the Fukushima meltdowns. The country is doing some serious soul-searching about nuclear power, and whether or not to bring reactors back on line. Meanwhile, its utilities are getting ripped off by distant natural gas suppliers that charge over four times the current price in the US.

Freeport already inked contracts with BP for half of its capacity and with the Japanese utilities Osaka Gas and Chubu Electric for the other half. So at least half, but probably much more of its shipments would be destined for Japan, still the most lucrative market in the world. Those contracts are already being leveraged by the Japanese government in its negotiations with Gazprom on a number of deals, including Japanese participation in an undersea pipeline from Russia’s Far East – which is far only from Moscow – to its neighbor, Hokkaido, the largest island of Japan.

But environmental groups in the US, already fuming at their erstwhile messiah, are getting madder with every fossil-fuel deal the Administration approves. The controversial Keystone Pipeline, which Native American opponents have equated with “environmental genocide,” is waiting in the wings. The Administration simply doesn’t want to get run over by the momentum of the oil and gas industry, and the thousands of high-wage jobs it has created. And it wants to lick its geopolitical chops.

Meanwhile, for the Administration, the plot thickens. Read…. Timothy Geithner Is Key To IRS Scandal