I have spent two week warning Ireland and the world about the Irish banking system, with a summation available in the aptly titled post,
If I Provide Proof That The Entire Irish Banking System Is A Sham, Does It Set Up A Much Needed System Reboot? Let's Go For It...Yesterday, the Irish media STARTS to come clean, although they are still not as explicit as the Irish Sun article which put my researched facts front and center…
Click to enlarge…
From the Irish Times
Yesterday, at the press briefing to discuss the Central Bank’s 2012 annual report, Honohan matter-of-factly told us that the Irish banks would need more funding before 2019 due to changes in capital reporting requirements imposed by the new Basel III accord.
The transition period for these changes to be implemented by banks in the EU is January 2019.
There were more than a few eyebrows raised at this frank admission.
Honohan’s statement is in stark contrast to those of the various Irish-owned banks –AIB, Bank of Ireland and Permanent TSB. In public at least, the banks have maintained that they are adequately capitalised and that they do not envisage having to raise additional capital to bolster their ratios.
From the Independent:
Mr Honohan said the Central Bank was still working towards carrying out stress tests on the banks at the latter part of the year. By 2019, the banks will need more capital under international regulations.
“In an ideal situation, that capital will come from private investors, as is happening all over Europe, all over the world, where bank capital is being pushed up through the market system,” he said.
From private investors? Yeah, right! As said private investors are hoodwinked, just like those poor muppets in the US – reference What Should The US Do If One Of The Biggest Irish Banks Blatantly Defrauded US Investors:
The Bank of Ireland
In the 2008 Annual Accounts (Irish version of Annual Report) of Bank of Ireland (see attached, page 178) it states the bank gave a first floating charge in favor of the Central Bank of Ireland (an arm of the European Central Bank) and the Financial Services Authority of Ireland over the Banks ‘right, title, interest, benefit, present and future, in and to certain segregated securities listed in an Eligible Securities schedule.’
Fact: The BoI 2008 Irish accounts (~annual report) refer to the charges in their Disclosure Section (see attached page from 2008 accounts) where they describe the charge as being over ‘certain segregated securities.’
Of paramount importance for US investors and regulators, there is an absolute omission of this information in the Bank of Ireland SEC 20F returns for 2008.
From the Irish Examiner:
However, banks would need capital over the medium term to comply with Basel III capital requirements by 2019. It is hoped the banks will be able to raise this from private investors, he added. He hoped Ireland would not need the help of the ECB’s outright monetary transaction programme when it exits the bailout programme. However, if it met certain criteria, then it would be able to use the facility.
But private investors have done so well in the Irish banks, particularly considering their pristine disclosure policies, right??? Again, reference What Should The US Do If One Of The Biggest Irish Banks Blatantly Defrauded US Investors:
The Bank of Ireland 2008 Irish Annual Accounts refer to the charges in their Disclosure Section (see attached page from 2008 accounts) where they describe the charge as being over ‘certain segregated securities,’ but no mention of ‘right, title, interest, benefit, present and future, in and to certain segregated securities listed in an EligibleSecurities schedule.’
There is also no mention of any information related to this floating charge in the Bank of Ireland SEC 20F returns for 2008.
It appears that this floating charge was not disclosed at the time of the stress testing of the bank conducted by the European Banking Authority.
It is possible that I may have overlooked such, and because of that possibility I have made the SEC 20F available for all who want to check over my work. Here is the UBI 2008 accounts and here is the SEC 20f-2008 for the Bank of Ireland.
Now of course, to constitute fraud there has to be a loss on the part of the one being defrauded or a gain on the part of the one being defrauded – at least according to Wikipedia. Otherwise, it would be a hoax. That’s the Irish banking system, and not this bank in particular. So…
If you believe that the information above actually identifies a gross misrepresentation of fact, omission or outright fraud, simply contact the SEC and let them know that Reggie Middleton suggested they look into it. You can actually use this form to convey my message.
Remember, extreme wealth concentrates, so you don’t have to… Coming from a “Cyprus’d” bank near you!
Subscribers, can download ALL documents supporting shenanigans by these banks (click here to subscribe):
- EU Bank Capital Confusion, Part 3 – It’s BIG! (professional and institutional subscribers only)
- Ulster Bank/RBS Supporting Charge Documents
- EU Bank Capital Confusion, Part 2 – Malarkey
- EU Bank Capital Confusion, Potential Failure